| |
Hollywood v. Superior Court (People) (2008) , Cal.4th
[No. S147954. May. 12, 2008.]
JESSE JAMES HOLLYWOOD, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.
(Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, No. 1014465, Brian Hill, Judge.)
OPINION
WERDEGAR, J.-
Does a prosecutor's consulting with the makers of a major motion picture that is based on a criminal defendant's story create a conflict sufficient to require recusal of the prosecutor when the defendant is finally brought to trial? Here, the lead prosecutor, bent on tracking down the fugitive defendant in this capital case, gave his case files to a screenwriter/director to make a movie based on the defendant's alleged life and crimes and consulted with the filmmakers during its subsequent production. The defendant, Jesse James Hollywood, was ultimately captured in Brazil and extradited to the United States. He moved to recuse the prosecutor, arguing that the prosecutor's involvement with Hollywood, the film industry, precluded his prosecution of Hollywood, the capital defendant. The trial court found no conflict warranting recusal, but the Court of Appeal independently {Slip Opn. Page 2} reviewed the record and granted Hollywood's petition for a writ of mandate, with one justice explaining the prosecutor had permitted " 'show business' to cast an unseemly shadow over this case."
|
|
 |
Site Map
Pasadena DUI Lawyers
The information on this California Criminal Defense Attorneys / Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
|
|
