Criminal Defense and DUI Lawyers - California Legal Team

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

   

People v. Concepcion (2008) , Cal.4th

[No. S146288. Oct. 27, 2008.]

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RYAN ESTEBAN CONCEPCION, Defendant and Appellant.

(Superior Court of Riverside County, No. SWF004991, Suzanne W. Knauf, Judge.)

(The Court of Appeal, Fourth Dist., Div. Two, No. E036353)

(Opinion by Corrigan, J., with George, C. J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Moreno, J., concurring. Concurring opinion by Werdegar, J.)


OPINION

CORRIGAN, J.-

Under Penal Code section 1043, subdivision (b)(2), a noncapital felony trial may continue in a defendant's absence, if the defendant was present when trial began, then later voluntarily absents himself.

Defendant's jury had been sworn, but on the morning of the first day evidence was to be taken, he escaped before court convened. Several hours later he was apprehended in a nearby community and the court was informed he could be returned to court the following morning. That afternoon the trial proceeded in his absence.

A divided Court of Appeal reversed, reasoning that "[defendant's] absence ceased to be voluntary once he was returned to custody." {Slip Opn. Page 2}

To the contrary, we hold that an escapee's voluntary absence includes the time reasonably required to return him to court after apprehension.

 
Los Angeles DUI Attorney & Violent Crime Lawyer
Los Angeles Employment Attorney
Site Map

The information on this California Criminal Defense Attorneys / Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

All case summaries are from public records and not associated with Dr. DUI or California Legal Team.